Search for: "In Re L." Results 9841 - 9860 of 22,398
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2015, 3:30 pm by Jason Rantanen
United States, 683 F.3d 1102, 1108 (9th Cir. 2012); In re American Cont’l Corp. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
Discovery Beyond the Report and the Deposition The lesson of the cases interpreting Rule 26 is that counsel cannot count exclusively upon the report and automatic disclosure requirements to obtain the materials necessary or helpful for cross-examination of statisticians who have created their own analyses. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Tel est le cas, de même, de la question du droit de la partie défenderesse à un recours collectif d’interroger des membres du groupe, notamment en vue d’établir, aux termes de l’article 1031 C.p.c., le caractère inapproprié d’un recouvrement collectif. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 11:33 pm
Borland Int’l, Inc., 49 F.3d 807, 815 (1st Cir. 1995), affirmed by an equally divided Court, 516 U.S. 233 (1996); Computer Associates Intern., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:48 pm
If you’re self-employed, you may have to pay them yourself. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:05 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Juvenile Law Opinions Body: AC37231 - In re Peter L. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am by Schachtman
At times, the judiciary’s resistance to delving into the factual underpinnings of expert witness opinions is extraordinary. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:12 am
Bone, "Trademark Functionality Reexamined"Other: TTABlogger Returns to Boston and Wolf GreenfieldTTAB Posts June 2015 Hearing ScheduleUSPTO Seeks Leave to Intervene In FLANAX 4th Circuit AppealTTAB Posts May 2015 Hearing ScheduleTTAB Posts April 2015 Hearing ScheduleText Copyright John L. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  We can’t be under the illusion that we can get all we’re interested in doing into one litigation. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 5:52 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
But if she shows up for scheduled appointments or calls without a clue, it could be a sign that you’re not her top priority – and when you’re paying for her time, you should be. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
   Trademark Directive/int’l legislation: term consumer isn’t present; it’s the “public” who is protected against likely confusion. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:04 am by SHG
It just keeps re-playing in my head. [read post]