Search for: "State v. Light" Results 9841 - 9860 of 28,240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2017, 4:00 am by Alice Woolley
Competence is not a binary state – a lawyer is not either competent or incompetent, and no lawyer has reached a state of perfection. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
7 May 2017, 5:53 pm
"  Further, he stated that the EU foresaw this policy in light of the emerging Internet of Things (IoT). [read post]
6 May 2017, 12:22 pm by Jim Gerl
          The Supreme Court of the United States issued the seminal decision interpreting the provisions of the IDEA in the case of  Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:37 am by Patricia Salkin
Wooster v Queen City Landing, LLC 2017 WL 1822611 (NYAD 4 Dept. 5/5/017)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Environmental Review [read post]
5 May 2017, 7:51 am by Sever | Storey
Perhaps one of the most important eminent domain cases in recent years was Kelo v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At BuzzFeed News, Chris Geidner reports on the court’s decision this week to send Alabama death-row inmate Taurus Carroll’s case back to the state court “’for further review in light of Moore v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 11:08 am by Michael J. Mueller
In light of the extensive negotiations between the State and Creamery to compromise on language to place on the milk label, the Eleventh Circuit found that the “State’s mandate was clearly more extensive than necessary to serve its interest in preventing deception and ensuring adequate nutritional standards. [read post]
In light of the extensive negotiations between the State and Creamery to compromise on language to place on the milk label, the Eleventh Circuit found that the “State’s mandate was clearly more extensive than necessary to serve its interest in preventing deception and ensuring adequate nutritional standards. [read post]
3 May 2017, 8:49 am by Amanda Van Hoose Garofalo
On March 3, 2017, the group of states suing the government over the Obama Administration’s guidance, which was discussed in our September 21, 2016, blog post, also dropped their lawsuit in light of the Trump Administration’s revocation of the Obama Administration’s guidance. [read post]