Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 9861 - 9880
of 12,727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2010, 1:53 pm
We’re not going to get to 30 or 35 by 2012, but it would be good if we picked up a few more. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
There, in an opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Court invalidated Section 4 of the Voting Rights, which identified specific state and local governments for special scrutiny before they could adopt changes to their voting laws with a potential racially disparate effect. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 7:31 am
The Court held a conference the day after the three days of arguments were finished, and the Justices have all cast their vote, and opinions have been assigned. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 9:00 pm
He therefore asked his audience, “What does justice require” (emphasis his). [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 11:32 am
Goertz, 21-442, the returning cases have all been relisted enough times that they’re more likely at this point to result in some kind of separate opinion than an outright grant. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:07 am
It's not mentioned anywhere in the majority or concurring opinions (6 justices), and even the dissent relegates it to a footnote. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 12:21 pm
Footnote 3 was the only part of the opinion in Trinity Lutheran not joined by Justices Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas, and therefore it only commanded a plurality of justices. [read post]
5 May 2021, 10:54 am
In her day job, she is 2020-2022 Equal Justice Works fellow in the Elder Justice Program. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 8:26 am
In re Oliver (1948). [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm
Spence also highlighted an opinion by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg that struck down state electricity regulations under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:20 am
Justice Frankfurter’s words were overtaken by fuzzier and more agency-friendly opinions. [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:00 pm
The Supreme Court, however, reversed in a 5-4 opinion written by Justice Joseph Lamar (see 4/29/1913 NY Times article), in which he stated: If the value of the road justified the issuance of stock in exchange for old shares, the creditors were entitled to the benefit of that value, whether it was present or prospective, for dividends or only for purposes of control. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:50 am
In re West Virginia Rezulin Litigation, W.Va. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 11:34 am
I mean you’re not trapped, the door [is] unlocked. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:15 am
A second opinion concluded that Y was in a vegetative state and that there was no prospect of improvement. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:16 pm
[In re Advisory Opinion No. 544 of N.J. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:48 pm
We're dealing with a new problem, one that could not have arisen prior to the Internet. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 4:24 am
Ex parte Arthur, 711 So. 2d 1097 (Ala. 1997) Arthur's application for re-hearing was denied 1998. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
Well, now we’re in unlawful discrimination territory. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:45 pm
Why was this a bench ruling rather than a written opinion? [read post]
