Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 9861 - 9880
of 17,256
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2013, 9:49 am
Assocs. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 8:49 am
The basics of the dispute in Rubin v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 5:49 am
Assocs. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 5:48 am
Wang stated that he was willing to answer questions, and he signed the waiver form. . . . [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 3:30 pm
Washburn student intern Amy Ahrens and I won in State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
BP failed on both counts at first instance but the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland decided that the marks were valid and enforceable and that trade mark infringement had occurred (BP Amoco plc v John Kelly Ltd [2002] F.S.R.5). [read post]
Recent California Federal Court Rulings Muddy the Interpretation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
28 Mar 2013, 11:46 am
Now, district and appellate court judges in a single federal case pending in the Northern District of California, U.S. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 8:56 am
I'm lucky to count lawyer Rick Schulte as both a friend and fellow lawyer on cases involving innocent consumers.Rick has been toiling away in pharmaceutical litigation, and he (like others) has been faced with the daunting task of addressing preemption issues in cases involving generic drugs.As many lawyers know, in 2011, the Supreme Court ruled in PLIVA v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 7:23 am
Massachusetts v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:14 pm
In Good v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 5:58 am
The trial judge denied the motion because he found that even if “M.G. and D.D. read the e-mails while . . . out of the state,” his court “had jurisdiction over those counts because it had jurisdiction over” count one, which “related to G.B. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
In her article, Professor Mullenix examines the upcoming United States Supreme Court decision in Oxford Health Plans LLC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
This is why, for example, testing a defendant’s white powder to see whether it is cocaine invades no reasonable expectation of privacy, under United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 3:43 pm
At his third trial he gets convicted on all counts involving three different girls. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 5:44 am
AC34156 - State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 5:11 am
’ State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 5:38 pm
Illinois State Bar Association and Arizona v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 3:37 pm
Thomas, held in DeHart v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 3:02 pm
(Non-compliant notices, as the statute states, have no effect whatsoever.) [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 2:01 pm
And yet, our criminal justice system has failed on every count: public safety, fairness and cost-effectiveness. [read post]
