Search for: "State v. Chance"
Results 9861 - 9880
of 12,117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2016, 10:46 am
And if outside experts are precluded from participation because they don’t have a TS/SCI clearance, then democratic oversight of the intelligence community doesn’t stand much chance. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:26 am
That would be certainly a possibility as not only the Berne Convention (Article 2(3)) mandates the protection of inter alia “other alterations of … artistic work”, but derivative works have been also held protectable under UK law (think of the famous Hyperion Records v Sawkins [IPKat here] as an example). [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm
To take one example: in a high-profile 2011 decision, Henry v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 7:23 pm
That is because federal law takes precedence over state laws. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 7:58 am
Unlike with Trump in the impeachment trial, the First Amendment clearly does apply here, and it has a very high standard for incitement under Brandenburg v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 7:23 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:47 pm
As you have stated in your article, the Reuters story was declared defamatory by the Indian Court which was subsequently removed from their website. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 12:00 am
Fair enough, but the legal test he proposes revolves around efforts made by the infringer, not the patentee, so even with maximum exertion at giving notice a patentee will have little idea of his chances going into trial. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:36 pm
The decision in Yates v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 4:06 pm
Example: Texas AG's action against Joseph Onwuteaka and his debt collection firm over mandatory venue violations: State of Texas v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 5:00 pm
Jones had a chance to do so. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:00 am
This process of judicial nullification culminated in Plessy v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:02 pm
That ruling came a year after the Court, in U.S. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 5:09 pm
Closely held companies are creatures of state law, and state laws on these issues are not uniform. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:55 am
We are not imagining what obstacles lie ahead if we were to “codify Roe v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:16 pm
See Ebenhoe v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 9:42 pm
Ct. at 1012, "especially weighing the factor[] of time elapsed since the inception of the suit," Smoke v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:40 pm
The case – Inserso Corp. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:04 am
”10 Elsewhere in the same chapter, the authors note that “chance, bias, and confounding” must be looked at, but again, the authors stop short of noting that these threats to validity must be eliminated: “Three general categories of phenomena can result in an association found in a study to be erroneous: chance, bias, and confounding. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 7:04 pm
The Supreme Court of Wisconsin may have added to the procedural complexity and uncertainty of Wisconsin postconviction law with its decision last week in State v. [read post]
