Search for: "Study v. State" Results 9861 - 9880 of 15,021
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The Department of Justice has said that it will carefully study this “significant” ruling. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:48 am by INFORRM
Chandra exposed flaws in his nutrition studies of infant formula and multivitamins. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
United States District Court, 503 U.S. 653 (1992) .................................................4 Gregg v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:13 pm by MJIL
Supreme Court opinion in Massachusetts v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 5:28 pm
Department Of State Website, usinfo.state.gov, Accessed 5/14/08) And The Supreme Court Has Upheld Regulations On Medical Marijuana: In Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
United States The manager of a New York City Shake Shack restaurant said he was unlawfully detained by police and “taunted” after he was falsely accused last year of poisoning three officers’ milkshakes. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
“ Ashford’s remarks were made during a Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism event at City University London last Tuesday, at which Lara Fielden introduced her new book examining the future of regulation. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
United States Donald Trump is to claim presidential immunity in a defamation case brought against him by former contestant on the Apprentice who accused him of unwanted sexual contact. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 6:30 am by Joy Waltemath
As stated above, Asian and Hispanic workers are the ethnic groups statistically over-represented in Job Group 070. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
Pell, a fellow in Governance Studies at Brookings, analyzed how current state laws place women at risk of prosecution for having an abortion. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 1:48 am by INFORRM
Humphreys J stated that there had been “no debate around the issue of the public interest, relevant to the anonymity of suspects, nor any consideration of the need for a fair balance of rights. [read post]