Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 9861 - 9880
of 14,197
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2012, 9:39 am
United States, 11-8737, and Gibbs v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:28 am
United States, by a vote of six to three, the Court held that a federal district court has the discretion to order a federal criminal sentence to run after a state criminal sentence that is anticipated but has not yet been imposed. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:30 am
Thread is now closed. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:28 am
United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992). [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:05 pm
In 1968, the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:25 pm
(For example, United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm
Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 12:50 pm
The U.S. case is U.S. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:44 am
United States and Printz. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 2:22 pm
The beginning of a motion filed in Louisiana on February 21, 2012: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: OIL SPILL by the OIL RIG "DEEPWATER HORIZON" MDL 2179 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:TRAHAN v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:57 am
Courts to adjudicate human rights disputes that have nothing to do with the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 9:30 am
., Federal Judge with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in Atlanta issued a lengthy ruling in a closely watched Americans With Disabilities Act case. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Or as Marshall put it in 1800: “[T]he people of the United States have no jurisdiction over offenses committed on board a foreign ship against a foreign nation. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Or as Marshall put it in 1800: “[T]he people of the United States have no jurisdiction over offenses committed on board a foreign ship against a foreign nation. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:45 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 3:38 am
It hurts because I've been spending more time than a Texan should watching the opinions come out of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:22 pm
Curiously, boxes are left unchecked for Mongolia, Zimbabwe and the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 2:53 pm
Going back to the Court’s ruling in the case of Helvering v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:32 pm
Juli 2010, in dem Rechtsstreit Air Transport Association of America, der American Airlines Inc., der Continental Airlines Inc. und der United Airlines Inc. auf der einen und dem Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (Minister für Energie und Klimawandel) auf der anderen Seite über die Gültigkeit der vom Vereinigten Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland erlassenen Maßnahmen zur Umsetzung der Richtlinie 2008/101/EG. [read post]
