Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 9881 - 9900 of 16,588
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2012, 11:55 am by Ira Meislik
Our good colleague Mark Senn touched on this topic in a recent article in the ABA-RPTE magazine -Probate and Property. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 3:47 pm by Daniel Richardson
  If you haven’t taken that nap yet, this is the part where the Association’s arguments suffer a sucking chest wound. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 11:13 am by tom
  The result of all this argument isn’t necessarily the abandonment of the mark, but that the Lance Armstrong Foundation now has to make the disclaimer requirement. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 3:29 am by Brian J. Brislen
  I am very perplexed by the bad loss to UCLA but in the scheme of things I’m not sure it really matters. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 2:02 am by Joe Sanders
At the same time, we haven't paid a lot of attention to related matters, such as how residency restrictions may impact offenders' efforts to find work and stability, how their living arrangements — what happens when they get released from prison, whether rates of recidivism have changed according to these policies and whether these policies have succeeded in increasing public safety. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 3:18 pm
If Starbucks hadn't sent a letter before action but simply issued proceedings; If the stay were granted, it might take years to resolve the invalidity proceedings before OHIM. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:54 am
If Starbucks hadn't sent a letter before action but simply issued proceedings; If the stay were granted, it might take years to resolve the invalidity proceedings before OHIM. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:54 am
This matters for proposals such as the Unified Patents Court... [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:38 pm
This matters for proposals such as the Unified Patents Court... [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 1:53 pm by Joseph DiCioccio
  The Second Circuit affirmed the denial of the preliminary injunction as it pertained to enforcing the red sole mark against monochromatic all-red shoes, holding that in those cases, without any contrast the red sole did not serve its source-identifying function (and thus couldn’t be a trademark, no matter how much secondary meaning it may have). [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:58 am by Andrew Ramonas
Akin consultant John Gilliland, who is handling the account, didn't immediately return messages seeking comment, and Council spokeswoman Marjory Walker didn't have an immediate comment. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:58 am by Andrew Ramonas
Akin consultant John Gilliland, who is handling the account, didn't immediately return messages seeking comment, and Council spokeswoman Marjory Walker didn't have an immediate comment. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:29 am by Robert Ambrogi
And in some cases, the other documents aren’t specific enough or contain language that could lead to “an unintended result. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am by Rob Robinson
http://bit.ly/NkiDKN (Andrew MacArthur) Why Keyword Search Won’t Go Away – http://bit.ly/NcEaF6 (Sheila Mackay) You’ve GOT [No] Mail! [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 11:45 am
For more information on this matter please, see our DUI car accidents page. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (I don’t think this is right—it’s about a normative statement that no actionable confusion is likely as a matter of law. [read post]