Search for: "Pass v. State" Results 9881 - 9900 of 28,445
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2010, 11:30 am by Stefanie Levine
[v] Additionally, protecting software inventions with hardware claims requires an unnecessary use of additional limitations that are not important for the software. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
United States could signal a retreat from the Court's willingness--in Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:34 am by Nora Ellingsen
Yesterday, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the United States Government in the case Microsoft v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 7:24 am by John McFarland
In 2011, the Texas Supreme Court decided Railroad Commission of Texas and Pioneer Exploration, Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 11:03 am
Only one medical facility in the state provides abortion services, and Planned Parenthood essentially "imports" those doctors to the state. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Note the headline assertion that British business is failing to protect innovation, then read on, says Jeremy.* Dutch Minister trumps Court of Appeal ruling, reasserts EPO immunityFollowing to the last events of the battle over the European Patent Office's governance, the Dutch Minister of Justice intervened with regard to the EPO's immunity from execution of court orders under international law, Merpel recounts.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that Member States are free to determine… [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:57 am by Daithí
Last month’s decision of the US Supreme Court in Brown v Entertainment Merchants’ Association (PDF) (formerly Schwarzenegger v VSDA) has attracted a lot of attention. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 5:50 am
In 1970, repeal laws were passed in four states (including Alaska, home of then-six-year-old Sarah Palin), putting into state law something much closer to what Roe v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Fifth Avenue Chrysler Center, Inc,, 454 P.2d 244, 247 (Alaska 1969).ArizonaNo Arizona court has directly passed on innovator liability, but the federal district court in the Darvocetlitigation twice held that the theory was incompatible with Arizona law. [read post]