Search for: "State v. Michael A." Results 9881 - 9900 of 13,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
In Ames v Spamhaus [2015] EWHC 127 (QB), handed down in January 2015, Warby J (who had been appointed the year before to replace Sir Michael Tugendhat as the primary specialist media law judge) was careful not to contradict Cooke, but his judgment suggested that the circumstances in which serious harm could be inferred (without evidence) might be more common. [read post]
28 May 2024, 7:42 am by Amy Howe
The state court in that case explained that in 1970, in Williams v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:37 am by New Books Script
[Toronto, Ont. : Magistrates' Courts], 1965 KF 224 B568 B53 1965 V.4 Regina vs. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The FTC goes on to allege that Tapestry “intends to raise prices for Michael Kors through reducing discounts and promotions and pulling back on wholesale. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 10:06 am by Lyle Denniston
  Kennedy was also the author of a broader gay rights ruling in 2003, Lawrence v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The report, a first of its kind, found that existing surveillance law is being eroded by six factors: the introduction of new laws that expand state surveillance powers; lack of legal precision and privacy safeguards in existing surveillance legislation; increased supply of new surveillance technologies that enable illegitimate surveillance; state agencies regularly conducting surveillance outside of what is permitted in law; impunity for those committing illegitimate acts of… [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 6:05 am
Activists were able to secure therapeutic laws in some thirteen states,not simply in the South (indeed I'm not sure which Southern states Gene Burns is thinking of, since a quick look at David Garrow's book reveals that Alabama failed to pass any legislation, Texas law, of course, remained draconian [Roe v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm by Fred Abrams
  The badges of fraud are also discussed by cases like Salomon v. [read post]