Search for: "Banks v. US" Results 9901 - 9920 of 14,527
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2012, 1:53 pm by Lindsey Williams
”I quote that final line because of a December 15, 2011 Court of Appeals decision from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, styled “DeGuelle v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am by Schachtman
It means that they are, at times, used in circumstances in which they should not be. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 4:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
” Barclays asserted that its customers were “highly sophisticated traders and asset managers” who used “extensive data” and not just marketing materials to make decisions. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 1:08 am
As discussed at the PLUS International Conference in November (about which refer here), the current financial turmoil could be used as a justification for legislative reform efforts – for example, an attempt to overturn Central Bank and Stoneridge. [read post]
29 May 2019, 12:22 pm
  If, at this stage, damages are an adequate remedy for the claimant, "there are no grounds for interference with the defendant's freedom of action by the grant of an injunction" (as per Lord Hoffmann in National Commercial Bank Jamaica v Olint Corporation [2009] UKPC 16 at [16] - a Privy Council case) . [read post]