Search for: "Level v. State"
Results 9901 - 9920
of 29,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2018, 9:07 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Imagine the president granted a set of pardons to assist a foreign adversary in waging war against the United States. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 4:30 am
It should be something closer to a strategic plan for future strategic planning at the local level. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 2:45 pm
Knutsen v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 2:45 pm
Knutsen v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 11:24 am
Both decisions are in the case United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 11:01 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:21 am
Adamian v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 4:30 am
My point here is only that the macro changes are happening, and they’re accompanied by substantial effects at micro levels. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 10:28 pm
I gather one consequence of my proposed approach would be that the Court would likely need to overturn United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 12:54 pm
” In re a Community Voice v U.S. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:00 am
To resolve legal problems, in reviewing the situation since 2013, in keeping with the various statutory duties owed under s 17, the Children Act 2004, s 11 and the Education Act 2002, s 175 the local authority must consider (i) the need to promote actively the welfare of the children, (ii) the fact that these children are British, with the right to remain here for the rest of their lives, and (iii) the impact on the proper development of the children which… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
Applying Dano (C-333/13, EU:C:2014:2358), member states are not constrained by any EU treaty provision or legislative measure from deciding the level of benefits for Zambrano carers. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
Moreover Dano sealed the argument that without any specific requirement or condition of EU law, decisions about the level of non-contributory benefits fall outside the CFR’s scope because the CJEU held that member states are not implementing EU law by prescribing conditions for the grant of special non-contributory cash benefits and the extent of such benefits. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 4:52 am
In Yim v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 4:05 am
In Klein v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 3:03 am
That's too high a level of generality. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 2:18 pm
Ambrosini v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Bakers Lose in Oregon Case, But Wedding Singers / Painters / Photographers Might Win
28 Dec 2017, 10:26 am
See United States v. [read post]
