Search for: "Billings v. United States" Results 9921 - 9940 of 10,162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Bill Marler
The litigation stems from one of the deadliest foodborne illness outbreaks in United States history. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm by VALL Blog Master
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 8:41 am by Nathaniel Sobel
But two new sources of information—the fifth volume of the Senate Select Intelligence Committee’s bipartisan report on Russian interference in the 2016 election and New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt’s new book “Donald Trump v. the United States”—raise even more questions about the investigation. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:58 pm by Joey Fishkin
In yesterday’s big campaign finance case, McCutcheon v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 9:07 am by Matthew Kahn
Submissions from outside the United States are welcomed. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Submissions from outside the United States are welcomed. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:41 am by Cyberleagle
” [1.23] If a Secretary of State decides that he wants to silence anti-vaxxers, the right way to go about it is to present a Bill to Parliament, have it debated and, if Parliament agrees, pass it into law. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Submissions from outside the United States are welcomed. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 3:20 pm by CFM Admin
In addition to the violations surrounding hypothetical performance, one adviser was also found to have (i) made false and misleading statements, (ii) advertised misleading model performance, (iii) been unable to substantiate performance shown in its advertisements, (iv) failed to enter into written agreements with people it compensated for endorsements, and (v) violated recordkeeping and compliance standards including filing a prospectus with the SEC which contained misleading statements… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by admin
In any event, Egilman was probably not committed to the violent overthrow of the United States government because he had found a better way to destabilize our society by allying himself with the lawsuit industry. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[vii] Compliance with Regulation D does not assure compliance with applicable state securities laws. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 11:20 pm
In a recent 5-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:01 am by John Palley
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 11:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Although famous for his workshop talents, Edison would be better understood as an early Bill Gates, his business success built on a keen appreciation of the power of aggressive intellectual property strategy and the frailty of antitrust law. n3Of the patent interference:Between 1880 and 1883, the competitors were embroiled in a hard-fought priority battle at the U.S. patent office over which team had been first to achieve a key insight. n89 The dispute went against Edison, and the issuance… [read post]