Search for: "Others Similarly Situated"
Results 9921 - 9940
of 12,099
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Chamberlain, Newcomer, and Adler, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated, sued 1021018 Alberta Ltd., d/b/a Just Think Media, an Alberta corporation, and Integraclick, Inc., d/b/a Clickbooth, a Delaware corporation, accusing them of a scheme to defraud consumers on the internet; the details are unimportant. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 12:11 pm
” As such, the testimony could not support the contention that their work was the same as was performed by allegedly similarly situated employees across the country. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
Clemens decision, the court held that the “recordkeeping rule” applies in situations where [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 7:34 am
Then why didn't you tell Joe or the unemployment commission about those other grounds? [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:26 pm
“Or other consideration” refers to compensation to in-state agents that is other than direct payment. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:23 pm
“Or other consideration” refers to compensation to in-state agents that is other than direct payment. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 12:43 pm
We cannot have a two-tiered system where students in private schools are identified as "disabled" because they are unable to succeed in the specific private school program in which they have been enrolled by their parents, while similarly situated students in public schools are provided with general education interventions. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:12 am
On the other hand, generally, a class representative not only has a "personal stake" in the substantive claim he or she asserts, but also a distinct procedural right to represent the interests of similarly situated individuals. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:21 pm
We’ll need financial incentives in the legal world that drive a similarly positive state of affairs before we will see a massive increase in legal productivity. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:05 pm
A few other noteworthy reforms are in the pipeline. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 12:07 pm
The revision seems to maintain the traditional treatment of IRAD and B&P costs as “private expense” in those situations in which the development cost was accomplished exclusively at private expense (Subsection 2(B)), but alters the traditional definition in those situations in which the development cost was accomplished “exclusively at government expense” (Subsection 2(A)). [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm
Interestingly, a report on this situation in Ireland correctly concluded that had more bishops followed canon law, instead of seeking a more “compassionate” strategy, much of the problem could have been avoided. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm
Interestingly, a report on this situation in Ireland correctly concluded that had more bishops followed canon law, instead of seeking a more “compassionate” strategy, much of the problem could have been avoided. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 10:19 am
This case is effectively indistinguishable from the other cases where Article III standing has been used; it's a garden-variety security breach with no known tangible consequences (other than lawyers looking for a little gravy). [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 3:08 am
They both begin with similarly spelled words that describe attributes of dog behavior and end with the identical word STRIPS. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 6:22 pm
But the judge found that requiring a mechanism for Plaintiffs and other similarly situated individuals to dis-enroll would be contrary to congressional intent, which was to provide mandatory benefits under Medicare part A for those receiving Social Security Retirement benefits. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 6:22 pm
But the judge found that requiring a mechanism for Plaintiffs and other similarly situated individuals to dis-enroll would be contrary to congressional intent, which was to provide mandatory benefits under Medicare part A for those receiving Social Security Retirement benefits. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 1:15 pm
However, Davis affirms that judges' statutory discretion to order lump sum spousal support payments extends considerably beyond those historically-limited circumstances:[51] We reject the appellant’s submission that Mannarino should be treated as restricting a court’s ability to award lump sum spousal support to situations “where there is a real risk that periodic payments would not be made” or to other limited and “very unusual… [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 10:13 am
Similarly, you will include the Respondent's name, address, telephone number, the number of employees working at the company and other similar background information. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 2:52 pm
The question, he said, was not whether the rabbi and those similarly situated could vote on the one day in question, but whether their right to vote was being denied entirely. [read post]
