Search for: "B&B LLC" Results 9941 - 9960 of 12,242
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2024, 8:23 am by Rich Vetstein
 The issue is controlled by a 2017 Appeals Court decision, Berger v. 2 Wyndcliff, LLC, 92 Mass.App.Ct. 517 (2017) which holds that restrictive covenants cannot be extended unless the original covenants contain a clear mechanism for such extension. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 7:26 am by Chukwuma Okoli
The chapters explore four key themes: (A) the status of choice of law rules, (B) the handling of foreign law before judicial authorities, (C) the treatment of foreign law by administrative or non-judicial authorities and alternative dispute resolution service providers, and (D) access to local and foreign law. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 9:37 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
According to the complaint, the cooks and dishwashers at Ramejo, LLC d/b/a Rancho Loco Mexican Grill & Bar and Fiesta Red Wing, LLC d/b/a Rancho Loco Grill & Bar were economically dependent on the restaurants because the workers lacked any opportunity for profit, needed no more than limited skills and initiative to perform their jobs, and were subject to control of their work and wages by the restaurant group. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm by John Elwood
§ 1252(a)(2)(D), or whether this determination is a discretionary judgment call unreviewable under Section 1252(a)(2)(B)(i). [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM the district court's denial of Info-Hold's Rule 60(b) motion. 08a0302p.06 2008/08/18 Petty v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
When an LLC that owned the development borrowed money from the bank, it required the wives of the owners to sign the loan agreement, agreeing to be “primarily and unconditionally liable” for the debt, so the bank could pursue them first, before pursuing the LLC’s owners. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am by Chris Wesner
P. 8019(b)(3). 1 Tagnetics appeals the Bankruptcy Court’s October 25, 2019 “Order Granting in Part Tagnetics’ Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Doc. 101) and Ordering Other Matters” (the “October 25 Order”). [read post]
” First, when size recertification is triggered pursuant to any scenario outlined in the new proposed regulation 125.12, the date to determine size will either be the date of the triggering event or, if the CO has requested recertification with the offer, the date of initial offer for a particular order or agreement (per 13 C.F.R. 121.404(b)(4)(iii)). [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
B GSE Gp., LLC, 2020 WL 4698984, No. 1:17-cv-142-RJS-DAO (D. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 9:13 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 636(b)(1) (extending time to file objections from ten to fourteen days). [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
In the present appeal, the Supreme Court is poised to resolve a circuit split concerning whether an Item 303 violation can serve as a basis for Section 10(b) liability. [read post]