Search for: "Day v. United States" Results 9941 - 9960 of 25,652
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2008, 3:49 am
Paper money is an entirely visual affair in the United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:24 pm
Like any polymer, DNA is made up of repeating monomer units, connected by chemical bonds to form one larger molecule. [read post]
In United States v. 480.00 Acres of Land, No. 07-13584 (Feb. 11, 2009), the 11th Circuit held that in calculating compensation, the federal government could take advantage of the fact that the local government's restrictive land use regulations had severely depressed the value of the acquired property. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:22 am by Margaret Wood
”  This proclamation references the 2013 case heard by the United States Supreme Court, Windsor v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 11:50 am by Sheppard Mullin
The Second Circuit based its holding upon a principle first announced by the United States Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 11:50 am
The Second Circuit based its holding upon a principle first announced by the United States Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:47 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
The case is Guyton v Tyson Foods, Inc., No. 3:07-cv-0088-JAJ, pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:07 am by admin
Last week, Bayer broke its Philadelphia losing streak, with a win in Kline v. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 2:59 pm
United States of America may be the most comprehensive ruling to date on the Debt Relief Agency provisions of BAPCPA as they apply (or don’t) to bankruptcy attorneys. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 7:10 am
Tomorrow, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Caperton v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:50 pm by John Elwood
United States (especially pp. 26–27 n.5) and its opp. in Franklin v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a case the justices will consider next week that asks whether a driver has a reasonable expectation of privacy in a rental car when he is not listed as an authorized driver on the rental agreement. [read post]