Search for: "Day v. United States" Results 9941 - 9960 of 25,652
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2017, 10:13 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
X of the State Constitution but also 147 includes eligible patients, as that term is defined in s [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 2:05 pm by Giles Peaker
A witness statement in support was served on 26 June 2014, which exhibited a letter dated 19 May 2014 (6 days after the review decision), in Portuguese, from Ms L’s mother stating clearly that she would not and could not accommodate Ms L and her household. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 9:15 pm by Patricia Salkin
Thus, the court held that the Board’s conclusion that 21 Seabran’s parcel needed 200 feet of frontage for every 300 gallons per day of wastewater was erroneous. 21 Seabran, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 7:42 am by Amy Howe
But there was one notable denial on today’s order list: Abbott v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Nicola Davies J handed down judgment on an application in the case of Hourani v Thomson ([2017] EWHC 56 (QB)). [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 10:05 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law A few days before he was sworn in as President of the United States, the complaint in Zervos v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 6:15 pm
That man is now on the verge of swearing a solemn oath  to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 1:07 pm by Amy Howe
The court also agreed to take on another case involving the scope of jurisdiction over companies that do business throughout the United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly:    At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the court’s recent decision to review National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 11:26 am by Alan Brackett
After receiving a distress call from the cruise, the United States Coast Guard searched for the decedent but did not find him. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
United Kingdom, the workplace surveillance was predicated upon suspicions of criminal activity, and in Copland v. [read post]