Search for: "State v. Powers" Results 9941 - 9960 of 36,866
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2024, 12:09 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plaintiff also stated in his affidavit that Boykin and another supervisor, Power, pressured plaintiff to say he was unable to perform his job duties because of his disability. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332, the Court of Appeals held that an arbitration award may be vacated by the court if it finds that arbitrator's award violates a strong public policy, is irrational or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power.Finding that in Petitioner's case the arbitrator's determination was supported by evidence in the record, that nothing in the record indicates that the… [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 1:53 pm by David Markus
If DOJ cannot exercise its power to invoke recidivist enhancements in drug trafficking cases less destructively and less brutally, it doesn’t deserve to have the power at all.And here's the entire order:US v Kupa Statement of Reasons Final [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Second, the framers of the Civil Rights Act sought to enforce the “privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states” protected under Article IV and described in the antebellum case Corfield v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 9:44 am by Eric Goldman
According to LinkedIn: Previously, hiQ moved to dismiss LinkedIn’s CFAA counterclaim on the merits for failure to state a claim. [read post]
Once again surprising the country by acting ten days before its own self-appointed deadline, a federal district judge in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a ruling today in the Ryan v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:19 pm by nflatow
In the Lafler majority opinion, Justice Anthony Kennedy highlighted the stark statistic that 97 percent of federal cases and 94 percent of state cases end in guilty pleas. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 8:42 am by Eric Goldman
The court summarizes: The primary effect of the DPIA provision is to compel speech…The State cannot insulate a specific provision of law from a facial challenge under the First Amendment by bundling it with other, separate provisions that do not implicate the First Amendment The court also says that the DPIA requirement “deputizes covered businesses into serving as censors for the State” because the DPIA risk “factors require consideration of content or… [read post]