Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 9961 - 9980
of 29,830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm
Applicable Legal Standards Official description: Actual and “red flag” knowledge requirements; financial benefit/right to control test; willful blindness; repeat infringers; good-faith requirements and Lenz; misrepresentation; fair use; use of representative lists; availability of injunctive relief; use of subpoenas; role of “standard technical measures”; and other pertinent issues. [read post]
2 May 2016, 1:11 pm
The court begins by explaining that `Timothy Allen Ladd, Jr. . . . appeals from judgment entered after he pled guilty to four counts of secretly using a photographic device with the intent to capture images of another person pursuant to [North Carolina General Statutes] §14–202(f).' State v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 1:10 pm
Class F–I felons released from prison had a higher rate of rearrest (44 percent) than Class B1–E felons (40 percent). [read post]
2 May 2016, 1:10 pm
Class F–I felons released from prison had a higher rate of rearrest (44 percent) than Class B1–E felons (40 percent). [read post]
2 May 2016, 11:17 am
., 797 F.3d 1020 (Fed. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:50 am
Corp., 252 F.3d 986, 989 (8th Cir.2001). [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:00 am
F. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:00 am
F. [read post]
2 May 2016, 7:00 am
The court concluded, however, that there was no evidence of misappropriation and that SASCO had sued the defendants based on the suspicion that they must have misappropriated trade secrets because the individual defendants went to work for a competitor, which subsequently secured a contract for which both companies were competing. [read post]
2 May 2016, 7:00 am
The court concluded, however, that there was no evidence of misappropriation and that SASCO had sued the defendants based on the suspicion that they must have misappropriated trade secrets because the individual defendants went to work for a competitor, which subsequently secured a contract for which both companies were competing. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
Defendants argue that RIME has failed to plead that Defendants acted knowingly under Section 1202. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 4:42 am
” Kelly was honored by Yale’s William F. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:03 pm
A New York Divorce Lawyer said that on 6 January 2010, the plaintiff, the husband moved by order to show cause and prayed for an order directing the return of their two children, A, age 7, and M, age 4, to New York State, for an order awarding the him temporary custody of their children, and for an order awarding the defendant, the wife, reasonable visitation with the minor children within the State of New York. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 12:00 pm
Sentelle and Stephen F. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:37 am
Beverly Hills Fan,21 F.3d at 1565; see also Acorda Therapeutics Inc. v.Mylan Pharm. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
., 917 F.2d 1574 (Fed. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:33 am
§ 2G2.2(b)(3)(F). [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 4:49 am
Curmi gets an A for effort, even if Baruch gets an F for giving him a degree. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 12:54 am
If the victim and defendant are married, the only situation in which rape can occur is under definition number three. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 1:24 pm
Early, 746 F.3d 546 (4th Cir. 2014). [read post]
