Search for: "Doe 35" Results 9961 - 9980 of 17,232
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2013, 1:30 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Does anyone under, say, 35 years old have any idea what a Rolodex is? [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 9:30 pm by Dan Flynn
If K State does not come around on this one, the world’s safety community is going to have less access to Powell and his work. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:26 am by Florian Mueller
The ITC staff (which participates in some investigations as a third party and does not make binding decisions) was convinced that the Transform does infringe that patent and asked the Commission to overrule the judge on this one right away. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 12:00 am
  Because the “first sale” doctrine does not protect against reproduction of copyrighted material, ReDigi could not successfully assert the defense for the present action. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
   Furthermore, Mr P was an important political figure and knowingly laid himself open to close scrutiny by journalists and the public [35]. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 12:10 pm by hls
10:30 Welcoming Remarks by Dean Minow 10:33 Alex Smith- symposium coordinator thanking everyone who put work into today. 10:35- room is almost full, so great to see so many people showing support! [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 12:47 pm by D. Daxton White
Churning claims arise out of the inherent conflict of interest involved because a financial advisor is compensated by commissions earned in buying and selling securities on behalf of a client. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 6:04 am by Dennis Crouch
Overall, Novartis had over 35 patents over this polymorphic form of Gleevec in different countries. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 2:42 pm by Bexis
City of New York, 35 Misc.3d 1209(A), 950 N.Y.S.2d 723 (table), 2012 WL 1231021 (N.Y. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 6:19 am by Eric S. Solotoff
Is this really a radical change, or in many respects, does it simply codify what is often done in practice anyway? [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 10:45 am by Dennis Crouch
After Gusella's patent issued Rubin sued under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 8:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
From within Ex parte Liebermann, 10/718,023We find Lynt explicitly discloses the disputed limitations of claims 1,22 and 27, and thus we affirm the rejections of these claims under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 8:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Accordingly, we reverse the rejection of claims 1-11under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 7:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
We concur and will not sustain the Examiner’s rejection of claims17-31 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 6:01 am by Kit Case
The 2007 rate cuts cost the system $315 million, or the 2007 equivalent of a 35% rate decrease. [read post]