Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 9961 - 9980 of 14,198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2012, 3:28 pm by Robert Vrana
Because infringement occurred “all over the United States, including Delaware . . . the claims arise in every judicial district. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:06 pm by Orin Kerr
United States, 436 U.S. 128, 130-43 (1978); United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:39 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Even if the United Kingdom, and in its slipstream the Netherlands, seem to take a tough stance towards the Court, Belgium, Germany, and Austria seem to be opposed to curtail the Court’s supervisory role in human rights protection. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:39 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Even if the United Kingdom, and in its slipstream the Netherlands, seem to take a tough stance towards the Court, Belgium, Germany, and Austria seem to be opposed to curtail the Court’s supervisory role in human rights protection. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:01 am by Michael O'Hear
§ 2254(d), which habeas limits relief to state-court decisions that are contrary to, or involve an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am by Richard Renner
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which applies to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, prohibits the use of excessive force by policemen in the course of an arrest, see, e.g., Graham v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:59 am by Raffaela Wakeman
More bad news from Afghanistan: Matthew Rosenberg and Thom Shanker document U.S. concerns that Afghanistan is not yet ready for the United States to withdraw its troops. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-799; Vance v. [read post]