Search for: "**smith v. Jordan" Results 81 - 100 of 234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm by Alyson Poole (AU)
For example, registration of a trade mark for a clothing brand “John Smith” would be unlikely to succeed, even if John Smith really is the name of the designer. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm by Alyson Poole (AU)
For example, registration of a trade mark for a clothing brand “John Smith” would be unlikely to succeed, even if John Smith really is the name of the designer. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Jordan Smith takes a close look at the case at The Intercept. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 1:02 pm
The case is Minder Music & Another v Sharples. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg Law, Jordan Rubin reports that “[q]uestions asked by Justice Neil Gorsuch” during yesterday’s argument in McGirt v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:22 am by Marie Louise
(Kluwer Patent Blog) Fortical (Calcitonin-salmon) – US: Obviousness in chemical formulations: (unclaimed) purpose of limitation leads to nonobviousness holding: Unigene Labs. and Upsher-Smith Labs v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:47 am
 | Criminalisation of IP and economics | Keeping count of blocked websites in the UK |Birkin Bags | Patentability of user interface designs in Germany |Smith & Nephew v ConvaTec | Report on IPEC litigation |does Twitter have a future? [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 8:00 am by Ilya Somin
NOTE: Some of the points made in this post were suggested by Nevada Solicitor General Lawrence VanDyke and Assistant Solicitor General Jordan Smith. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
” At Slate (via How Appealing), Lorelai Laird writes that United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 52 [week ending on Sunday 14 June] - EU TM reform | Motivate Publishing FZ LLC and another v Hello Ltd | EPO’s Inventor of the Year: poll results | New network for new IP people | Delfi v Estonia | UPC fees | Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc | Canary Wharf Group Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and… [read post]