Search for: "*lewis v. Davis"
Results 81 - 100
of 332
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm
On 16 and 17 July 2019 the Court of Appeal (Sharp P, Vos C and Davis LJ) heard the appeal against the judgment of Warby J in the case of Lloyd v Google LLC. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
This post was authored by Megan Lewis. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
This post was authored by Megan Lewis. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
Davis; one of the petitioners argues that his case is a better vehicle than Davis and should be heard in tandem with it. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
University of Texas and its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 3:15 am
Here is Lewis’s judgment about the decision’s historical significance: “Without New York Times v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 10:00 pm
In Davis v Bandemer, 478 U.S. 109 (1986), the U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
In reaching this result, the Grutter Court relied heavily on Justice Lewis Powell’s writing 25 years earlier in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
21 Lewis & Clark L. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 17-5239, Davis v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 pm
Moroney v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 4:48 am
Under the Supreme Court’s 1999 decision in Davis v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 4:05 pm
Piepenbrock v London School of Economics, heard 16, 17, 20 23, 24 and 27 July 2018 (Nicola Davies J). [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
Daniel O’Connor, Daniel V. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 6:12 am
(Delaware Supreme Court and Harvard Law School), on Wednesday, September 12, 2018 Tags: Campaign finance, Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 6:32 am
Lewis, 138 S. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 6:16 am
Halper, Ellen V. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
Callahan, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, on Friday, July 20, 2018 Tags: Janus Capital v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:17 pm
After some thirty years of wrestling with the cumbersome six-part test set forth in Davis & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:17 pm
After some thirty years of wrestling with the cumbersome six-part test set forth in Davis & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
