Search for: "*u. S. v. Price" Results 81 - 100 of 871
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2023, 7:49 am by Brian Price
Según lo declarado por las National Academies, “estos problemas incluyeron errores de medicación, altas tasas de uso de drogas psicotrópicas, mal manejo de los síntomas de comportamiento entre los residentes con enfermedad de Alzheimer u otras demencias”. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 6:38 pm
Desde La Habana, el sacerdote de Ifá, Víctor Betancourt, dijo que la oficialista Asociación Cultural Yoruba rompió con los acuerdos establecidos desde 2016 y este año hicieron la ceremonia "a puerta cerrada, sin convocar a nadie de la comisión". [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 4:23 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Group II LLC v Nabe (2022 NY Slip Op 30399[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2022]), Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Jennifer G. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 5:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Rosenbaum v Myers, 2022 NY Slip Op 33975(U)  November 18, 2022  Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: Index No. 652971/2019  Judge: Lucy Billings is a most unusual story. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am by David Kopel
Frosh, Bowie knife laws are an important part of his argument, including with a citation to my article Knives and the Second Amendment, 47 U. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 2:31 pm by Guest Author
The leading case is the 3rd Circuit’s 1993 decision in U.S. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:06 pm by Reference Staff
One of the most famous censorship cases to land in the courts is United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am by Jack Goldsmith
A firm might want to deliver high-end advertisements to wealthy neighborhoods, or to deliver coupons when customers enter the mall, or offer a Burger King discount at a McDonald's, or promote farm-related software in rural areas.[5] In addition, online firms seek to segment markets geographically so that they can price discriminate based on differences in wealth or product demand by geography. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
New York State Liquor Authority[15] involved a New York law under which liquor distillers could not sell to wholesalers in New York except in accordance with a monthly price schedule that affirmed that prices in New York were no higher than the lowest prices charged in other states.[16] Healy v. [read post]
  Outside of this directive, the agencies generally have taken the view that prior enforcement of the antitrust laws was too lax and that the narrow focus on more traditional antitrust harms (such as higher prices, reduced output, or lower quality) has been too narrow. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 5:18 pm by Kalvis Golde
The court found that the company’s executives knew they were reporting higher U&C prices. [read post]