Search for: "3D Construction v. Old Standard" Results 81 - 100 of 214
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm by Josh Blackman
Holder, under the old regime, an LPR “could travel abroad for brief periods without jeopardizing his resident alien status. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 4:55 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Lishman (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 1288), or a more deferential “substantial evidence” standard of review (as held by Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 8:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Piety: one canon of construction: you should not interpret a statute so that some part is surplusage. [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 8:53 am by INFORRM
On April 8, 2011, William Socha was working on a construction site in Manchester. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 6:39 am
As usual, the court begins the opinion by explaining how, and why, the lawsuit arose:On April 8, 2011, William Socha was working on a construction site in Manchester. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 3:52 am by Jason Rantanen
  Second, the earlier decision in Dow applied the old law: Dow argues that our opinion in the previous appeal was not inconsistent with Nautilus and that we did not apply the “amenable to construction” or “insolubly ambiguous standard. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  But regardless, we do get a more 3D picture of the consumer in the false advertising cases because of the concept of materiality: TM law structurally isn’t set up to offer this thicker account of consumer decisionmaking. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Daunting to do it, and not up to my standards. [read post]