Search for: "ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS" Results 81 - 100 of 168
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2013, 6:37 am by Daniel E. Cummins
”     Judge Minora cited the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas case of Rotunda v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 8:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Stanton Wettick Jr. of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas recently addressed this very issue and allowed the consolidation of two separately filed motor vehicle accident lawsuits brought by the same plaintiff in the case of Jackson v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 8:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Stanton Wettick Jr. of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas recently addressed this very issue and allowed the consolidation of two separately filed motor vehicle accident lawsuits brought by the same plaintiff in the case of Jackson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   Without Opinion, the trial court entered an Order transferring the entire matter to the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County). [read post]
20 May 2013, 10:12 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  Judge DelaVecchio the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County granted State Farm’s motion and denied the insureds’ motion. [read post]
12 May 2013, 4:40 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Stanton Wettick of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas recently allowed the consolidation of two entirely separate motor vehicle accident lawsuits by a same Plaintiff in the case of Jackson v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 1:21 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
   The Court felt that this would be improper as was previously held in the Allegheny Court of Common Pleas case of Stepanovich v. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 11:24 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Chester County Hospital, 36 A.3d 83 (Pa. 2011), the Superior Court's decision found at 961 A.2d 192 (Pa.Super. 2008), recognizing a new variation of the tort, was allowed to stand. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:14 am by Daniel E. Cummins
A recent post-Koken trial order in this regard was issued by Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael T. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:14 am by Daniel E. Cummins
A recent post-Koken trial order in this regard was issued by Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas Judge Michael T. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:48 am by PritzkerLaw
Pritzker filed a Listeria lawsuit in The Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County Pennsylvania in 2010 on behalf of an older man who became paralyzed from drinking contaminated raw milk. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:48 am by PritzkerLaw
Pritzker filed a Listeria lawsuit in The Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County Pennsylvania in 2010 on behalf of an older man who became paralyzed from drinking contaminated raw milk. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 10:49 am by Robert Wagner
Stanton Wettick, Jr. of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (which includes Pittsburgh) recently issued an opinion where he extensively discusses the case law surrounding when a litigant is entitled to access an individual’s social networking site and what must be produced if it is. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:03 pm
Lesko (opinion here), Allegheny County Judge Wettick provided a great resource for anyone researching social media discovery issues. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 10:39 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas Judge R. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:00 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
In the recent Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas decision by Judge R. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:20 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Koken Panel: Honorable Ronald Folino Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas Thomas McDonnell, Esquire Summers, McDonnell, Hudock, Guthrie & Skeel Louis Long, Esquire Pietragallo, Gordon, Alfano, Bosick & Raspanti William Wagner, Esquire Marnen, Mioduszewski, Bordanaro, Wagner & Sinnot 2 Substantive and 1 Ethics credits CLE program: • Lawyers: $125 • Claim representatives: FREE Name(s):… [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:28 pm by Schachtman
In Betz, the Superior Court reversed an Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas judge’s Frye ruling, in an asbestos mesothelioma case, that an expert witness’s opinion that each exposure had been a “substantial contributing factor” was both novel and not generally accepted. [read post]