Search for: "ALLES v. INTERSTATE POWER CO."
Results 81 - 100
of 468
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2022, 5:52 am
Kellman v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 11:00 am
Below is a brief summary of the cases the Court considered: Southwest Airlines Co. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:53 am
And in 2021 in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2021, 9:54 am
This limitation is constitutionally mandated, separating our branch from our political co-branches. '[F]ederal judges—who have no constituency—have a duty to respect legitimate policy choices made by those who do.' [quoting Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm
Moreover, while it's true that "optimal tariffs" (where one has the requisite market power) can benefit the jurisdiction that imposes them, there is still likely to be deadweight loss from the standpoint of all jurisdictions - suggesting that they should all agree to forgo even optimal tariffs if they are making this choice behind the veil.If we accept the generalization that tariffs are bad, and what's more view the federal courts under the DCC as… [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Federal courts with judges from across the political spectrum have all seen fit to block them because they do not have the power to overrule precedents of the U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 3:15 pm
(As will become clear, I see some of the issues differently from some of my co-bloggers.) [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 1:55 pm
And it seems like a lot of these fires start because there’s a power line outage and we’ve got tens of thousands of miles of, I take it, exposed power lines around. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 12:12 pm
In PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 3:15 pm
From Mashaud v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 12:02 pm
In PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 1:20 pm
Ezaki Glico Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 6:25 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court held 5-4 in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 1:20 pm
In today's Supreme Court decision in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
" That could be read, if one is interpreting the words "any other" in the abstract, as covering "all [employment] contracts within the Congress' commerce power,"[8] or at least any workers engaged more directly in foreign or interstate commerce, such as workers at hotels, people who do telephone sales, and the like. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 7:07 am
Sixteen years ago, this Court held that Congress' power to regulate interstate commerce authorized it "to prohibit the local cultivation and use of marijuana. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 11:08 am
American Express Co., 585 U. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:36 am
The NCAA didn't just lose in today's Supreme Court decision in NCAA v. [read post]
