Search for: "ATLANTA FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT ALL JUDGES" Results 81 - 100 of 654
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Roger Parloff
Unlike the First Circuit ruling in Delaney, Haldeman is binding on the judges hearing criminal cases stemming from January 6, who all sit on the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 11:09 am by Anna Bower
And, barely 24 hours later, Lindsey Graham’s legal representatives appeared before a federal judge in Georgia to argue that the senator from South Carolina couldn’t possibly comply with the subpoena. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has now deemed those restrictions unconstitutional. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 6:08 am by Philip Mousavizadeh
The announcement came on the same day that a federal judge rejected efforts by Senator Lindsey Graham, to avoid giving testimony before the special grand jury hearing evidence in the case in Atlanta. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 10:05 am by Anna Bower
Judge McBurney scheduled a high-noon showdown to sort it all out. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Record Number of Trans and Nonbinary People Are Running for Office MSN – Anne Branigan (Washington Post) | Published: 7/27/2022 In 2017, former journalist Danica Roem made history when she was elected to the Virginia House of Delegates, making her the first out transgender state legislator in the U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 1:36 pm by Parks, Chesin & Walbert
 There also are the procedural rules, which include both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local court rules, the latter of which are specific to that district court. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Alaska – Judge Refuses to Block Alaska Campaign Finance Disclosure Rules MSN – Becky Bohrer (Associated Press) | Published: 7/14/2022 A federal judge denied a request to block campaign finance provisions of a ballot measure approved by Alaska voters in 2020, finding the plaintiffs had not demonstrated a likelihood of success on their outlined claims. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:48 am by Marcia Shein
Federal criminal charges are handled by the federal District Courts. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Court Judge Tim Kelly said the committee had demonstrated its need for the party’s data on its fundraising emails between November 3, 2020, and January 6, 2021, when the RNC and Trump campaign sent supporters messages falsely suggesting the election was stolen. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court justices and federal judges to tougher disclosure requirements for their financial holdings and stock trades passed the House in a rare show of bipartisanship. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Kai Kahele, a Hawaiian Airlines pilot, has used proxy votes on all but five of this year’s 125 roll calls. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Court Judge David Carter’s ruling came as he ordered the release to a House select committee of 101 emails from Trump ally John Eastman, rejecting Eastman’s effort to shield them via attorney-client privilege. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
In striking down the lead charge brought in the government’s Capitol siege investigation, punishable by up to 20 years in prison, District Court Judge Carl Nichols broke with all other U.S. trial judges in Washington who have ruled on the question in Capitol riot cases to date. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 2:19 pm by JD Hull
In case you didn’t know Kadhimiya is a Shia district, I have a Sunni family na [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm by Laurence Tribe and Dennis Aftergut
And the court did so because, as the judge wrote, “the alleged facts of this case are without precedent. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 11:36 am by Neil H. Buchanan
Walker of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida issued a preliminary injunction against UF to prevent it from continuing to selectively enforce a standardless policy that can be used to prevent professors from testifying against "the state" -- and supposedly, therefore, the "interests of the university" -- as expert witnesses. [read post]