Search for: "Aaron T. Jones" Results 81 - 100 of 169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2014, 3:57 am
But when they don’t violate such constraints, they are simply democracy in action. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:15 pm by Steve Vladeck, Benjamin Wittes
Although Thomas Jefferson apparently thought otherwise, Chief Justice Marshall, when presiding in the treason trial of Aaron Burr, ruled that a subpoena duces tecum could be directed the President. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:37 am by Anna Christensen
  At the Huffington Post, Aaron Belkin also comments on that line of attack. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 12:00 pm by Laurie Lin
For undergrad, she was cum laude at Tufts; he graduated from the University of Washington. - She’s at Jones Day doing securities litigation. [read post]
They relied heavily on prior decisions that presidents are not immune from legal process—stretching back to the enforcement of a subpoena for President Jefferson’s documents in the treason trial of Aaron Burr, and including the decisions in the Nixon tapes case and the civil lawsuit that Paula Jones brought against President Clinton. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 7:23 am by Eugene Volokh
(The pamphlet itself was also written by someone who was not a journalist or printer, William Jones, a lawyer and judge.) [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 1:36 pm
Dep't of Corr., 829 N.E.2d 505 (Ind. 2005), was wrongly decided. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 6:00 am by James Andrews
To the court, this was a fair trade (like Mark Ingram and Cam Newton for Frank Gore and Julio Jones, for example…). [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 6:00 am by James Andrews
To the court, this was a fair trade (like Mark Ingram and Cam Newton for Frank Gore and Julio Jones, for example…). [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:06 pm by David Lat
Going pro se often doesn’t turn out well — as the old adage goes, “He who is his own lawyer has a fool for a client” — but John Ray isn’t the typical pro se litigant. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed at The Hill (via How Appealing), Ronnell Andersen Jones and Aaron Nielson suggest that “[t]he Court’s experiment in an untraditional argument format is even more proof that yes, Clarence Thomas has something to say. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:38 am by Tom Goldstein
Here are five of our favorite comments from Friday: Curt Levey – I agree with Aaron’s analysis if not his definition of “race-conscious. [read post]