Search for: "Advocates v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 12,789
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 6:26 am
The efficient markets hypothesis is over 50 years old.Basic v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:01 am
This was already the question in 1996 when [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg penned the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm
Her death sparked outcry from human rights advocates, who urged the government to reform the lèse-majesté (royal insult) law and to stop persecuting State critics. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Aug 29, 2023 | Could West Virginia v EPA Strengthen State Climate Laws | Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Schweber and Anderson explain that under the test established in Brandenburg v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:29 pm
BrazilBig Pan Bakery v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:00 am
That was the argument before the Florida Supreme Court in the case of Malicki v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:19 am
See Weinberger v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:46 am
TVA v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 8:31 am
A landmark case, Okeechobee Resorts, L.L.C. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
In Sohm v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:32 am
In March, our team at Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection—along with our co-counsel at Law Forward and Stafford Rosenbaum, LLP—settled Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:27 am
Randall (1958), which struck down a denial of a property tax exemption to people and organizations that "advocate[] the overthrow of the Government of the United States … by … violence … or who advocate[] the support of a foreign government against the United States in the event of hostilities": [A] discriminatory denial of a tax exemption for engaging in speech is a limitation on free speech. [read post]
13 May 2024, 9:06 pm
Advocates of the cultivated products say consumer freedom and choice argue for letting the market dictate the future. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:37 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:50 am
Kordonsky denied the shareholders intervention based upon their pro se status under Park, but I think there may be room for debate over whether the shareholders sought intervention solely in a representative capacity on behalf of the entity, rather than to advocate for their own individual interests as shareholders. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:55 am
In Tuskia v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:41 pm
S. 555 (1983), and United States v. [read post]
