Search for: "Amendment To Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure" Results 81 - 100 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
Florida, No. 08-7412 (5/17/2010) As noted above, juvenile life without parole is unconstitutional for nonhomicide offenses. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
Florida, 14-7505, a twice-relisted capital case involving a murder in a Florida Popeye’s. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The verified amended answer contained a counterclaim for divorce on the ground of adultery under Domestic Relations Law § 170(4). [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm by Tom Goldstein
Florida that it is never “cruel and unusual punishment” to sentence a juvenile to life in prison without any possibility of parole – a position that even the conservative Chief Justice Roberts rejected. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am by Anna Christensen
Florida (08-7412) Argued: Nov. 9, 2009 Issue: Whether the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishments prohibits the imprisonment of a juvenile for life without the possibility of parole as punishment for the juvenile’s commission of non-homicide. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am by John Elwood
Alabama (prohibiting mandatory life-without-the-possibility-of-parole sentences for juveniles) applied retroactively. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am by John Elwood
Alabama (holding that the Eighth Amendment prohibits juvenile homicide offenders from being sentenced to life without parole) applies retroactively, they should have just been holds for Montgomery v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am by Edith Roberts
Florida’s requirement that juvenile offenders convicted of nonhomicide crimes not be sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:18 am by Bill Raftery
On November 2012 ballot Florida As with Arizona, the Florida interest in changing the mandatory retirement age was connected to changes to judicial selection. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am by John Elwood
Florida barred lifetime post-release supervision of a person sentenced as a juvenile. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 9:40 am
The Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and the ICCPR prohibit arbitrary or unlawful interference with a child's privacy.446 This prohibition, along with other international legal guarantees of treatment with dignity, respect, and protection from cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, underlie the minimum standards for privacy set forth in the UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (the Beijing Rules). [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Francis was held at the Nassau County Correctional Center.As part of the procedure followed by the Nassau County Police Department, upon Francis's arrest, his fingerprints were taken and submitted to federal databases. [read post]
Example: brief by former juvenile offenders in Graham v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
Petitioner Bostock worked for the Clayton County Juvenile Court System as a child welfare services coordinator. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
Florida, which held that the Eighth Amendment prohibits sentencing juvenile offenders to life in prison without parole for crimes other than murder, did not clearly prohibit Virginia’s program that allowed eventual “geriatric release. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Castro, 540 U.S. 375 (2003); and 2) although no notice of the recharacterization would have been required under the rules set out in US v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:50 am by Matthew Guariglia
The Fourth Circuit court of appeals has also called warrantless use of aerial surveillance a violation of the Fourth Amendment. 5. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:50 am by Matthew Guariglia
The Fourth Circuit court of appeals has also called warrantless use of aerial surveillance a violation of the Fourth Amendment. 5. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Guadalupe-Rivera, No. 05-1939 Sentence for charges involving drug distribution and firearm violations is affirmed over defendant's contentions that the district court: 1) abused its discretion in refusing to conduct an evidentiary hearing on whether certain prior convictions on which the court based his sentence were actually part of the instant offense; and 2) erred in relying on his confidential juvenile record without disclosing the content of that record to him. [read post]