Search for: "Application of Peter Andrews (3 Cases)"
Results 81 - 100
of 290
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2023, 1:01 am
Since the previous edition, updated until March 2022, there have been several law changes, as well as new case law and updates in the Guidelines. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
On 10 March 2023 there was a contempt application in the case of Miller -v- Peake QB-2022-001106. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am
Last Week in the Courts On 27 and 28 February 2023, Nicklin J heard applications in the case of CR and others v Paymaster (1836) Limited trading as Equiniti. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 9:10 am
Data based on a snapshot from the Unified Patent Court Case Management System taken at 23:09 CET on 3 March 2023. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:16 pm
The application of these new rules should lead to a harmonised practice between the different local, regional and central divisions. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Selikoff is a difficult case because he was wrong on many issues, and his reputation, authority and prestige ultimately became much greater than the evidence would ultimately support. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 4:47 am
Once the relevant details have been gathered, the case law highlights the importance of providing all relevant information to the court. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 4:23 am
In any case, and to conclude, it must be noted that with its series of 7 decisions of February 1st, particularly those relating to article 3 a) of the SPC regulation and the one commented on today, the Cour de Cassation has established the framework of a clear method of SPC applications assessment, and therefore a guarantee of security, for the applicants. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 1:13 pm
City of Fargo, Case No. 3:22-cv-183. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 3:10 am
The classic case is patent literature from same IPC class as the opposed patent, or even earlier patents by the same applicant. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 2:40 pm
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2022 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 Guide to EU and UK Pharmaceutical Regulatory Law, Eighth Edition by Sally Shorthose€ 265 The Digital Economy and International Trade: Transnational Data… [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
The cases are therefore proceeding alongside one another. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 1:00 am
Peter Dorchester, we noted that a further case, Re St Mary Barnes [2021] ECC Swk 10, considered a monument commemorating the Hoare family of Barn Elms and their links with the slave trade. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 6:51 am
Michael & All Angels Berwick [2021] ECC Chi 9] [Top of section] [Top of post] Re Jesus College Cambridge [2022] ECC Ely 1 The judgment deals with procedural and evidential issues, including refusing the objectors’ application to adjourn the hearing listed for 2-4 February 2022 in order to obtain the expert evidence of a historian, and refusing the petitioners’ application to call an eighth witness. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 4:33 pm
The extensive number of prior CJEU referrals on Article 3(c) was seen not as a sign of settled case law but rather as reflecting persisting difficulties of interpretation, and the specific case at hand was regarded as showing significant similarities to the cases underlying the pending Finnish and Irish CJEU referrals. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 8:03 am
Another way this bill balances the interests of different parties is its lack of retroactive applicability. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 8:03 am
Another way this bill balances the interests of different parties is its lack of retroactive applicability. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 11:24 pm
In that case the same local/regional division is competent. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 12:30 am
Andrew Cherry Hinton [2022] ECC Ely 6 The petitioner was 18 when her brother committed suicide in 1988. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 12:56 am
In Re St Peter Sibton [2022] ECC SEI 3, Gau Ch observed: “I note that the petitioners refer to shortened pews as ‘pewlets’”. [read post]
