Search for: "Application of Rodgers"
Results 81 - 100
of 270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Turning to the merits, Judge Rodgers found that BSDL’s claim was clearly meritorious, because the stay was contrary to the New York Convention. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:24 am
Rodger, 2010 U.S. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:13 am
The bill also mandates a government report identifying 350 megahertz of spectrum between 3.1 and 3.45 GHz for auction, to be used for either exclusive commercial or some combined public-private application with the DOD. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 8:37 am
Rodgers, 569 U. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
By a majority (Lords Phillips, Brown and Rodger dissenting), the court held that the fact that the appellants would have lawfully been detained in any event did not affect the Secretary of State’s liability in false imprisonment. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Rodgers and Reps. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:50 am
Supreme Court The main issue for the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Collins, Clarke and Dyson) to decide was whether the First and Second Complaints were based on the same grounds, such that the general principle that the same cause should not be brought against somebody twice (nemo debet bis vexari pro una et eadem causa) was engaged. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
Lord Rodger cites McHugh and Kirby JJ (High Court of Australia, Applicants S396/2002 and S395/2002 v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 10:31 am
Rodgers v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:51 am
But he added: "An applicant would not be considered for the period of his disqualification. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:59 pm
At [63]-[64] Lord Rodger stated: “What’s in a name? [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:41 am
Lord Rodger also raises an intriguing point of statutory interpretation. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:30 am
Rodgers, Jr., & Elizabeth Burleson, Rodgers Environmental Law, 2d. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:01 am
As recently as January 2010, Lord Rodger stated in In re Guardian News and Media Limited [2010] 2 WLR 325 that on the existing Strasbourg case law, a right to obtain any information which would not be otherwise available to a person “is not within the scope of Article 10(1)”. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
Minton’s case did not present a disagreement over the applicable patent law; the parties merely disagreed on the facts, and such a dispute could, and should, be resolved by a state court. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:04 pm
Rodgers, 461 U. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
On Monday 28 March, Peter Stewart v The Queen will be heard by Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
16 May 2009, 4:00 am
Rodgers, 2009 U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 9:10 am
The CCA remanded the case to consider sufficiency under a theory of burglary contained in the jury charge, but not in the application paragraph. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:03 pm
Linzer’s research confirms what Families Against Mandatory Minimums (FAMM) has suspected for years: It appears that commutation applicants are denied with little or no meaningful review. [read post]
