Search for: "BENEFIT v. PFIZER, INC." Results 81 - 100 of 201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  The Decherts are too involved in this litigation to comment publicly.There aren’t many research-oriented pharmaceutical companies based in Alabama, and after last week’s execrable decision in Wyeth, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Pfizer Inc., 58 A.D.3d 138, 141 (N.Y. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 2:37 pm by Paul A. Prados
  Lower middle class residents sought to prevent the City of New London Connecticut from taking their property via eminent domain as the owners argued the property was not being taken for "public use" as required by the 5th Amendment.Our antagonist in this story, Pfizer, Inc. wanted to build a large scale commercial development, and seizing the property of private homeowners was necessary to achieve Pfizer's goal. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:40 pm by Bexis
”  Central Regional Employees Benefit Fund v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 482 F.3d 1187, 1194 (9th Cir. 2007); Phelps v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
So many people have been emailing the IPKat to ask him if he has seen yesterday's General Court decision in Case T-332/10 Viaguara v OHIM - Pfizer (VIAGUARA) that he's beginning to worry if they are trying to tell him something. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:02 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Courts have precluded the use of class actions against drug makers in most cases (see, e.g., Valentino v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 11:58 am by Ken
That abuse was at the heart of the case Kelo v. [read post]