Search for: "Ball v. District of Columbia" Results 81 - 99 of 99
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2010, 6:32 pm by Ray Dowd
Plaintiff claimed that Defendant used his copyrighted photograph depicting a golf club, tee, and a golf ball with the “Wild Dunes” logo depicted on it, in Defendant's real estate advertising campaign. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:00 am by Sharon Armstrong
  In a nice article on this matter, the Los Angeles Times has queried, “Would a reasonable person confuse a USC logo on a garnet-and-black ball cap in Columbia, S.C., with the same letters on cardinal-and-gold sportswear worn by a Trojans fan at the Coliseum? [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 3:03 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
Follow the bouncing ball: Subsection (i) says that ENDA covers "an employee as defined in section 701(f) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e(f). [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 8:01 am
There's probably too much wheeling and dealing taking everyone's attention off the ball; the ball being, consumer safety.Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Armand Rossetti [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 8:01 am
There's probably too much wheeling and dealing taking everyone's attention off the ball; the ball being, consumer safety. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 3:09 pm
Although it is not likely, do New York's weapon statutes go too far as to fly in the face of the Second Amendment as we saw in the District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 3:26 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated a sanction against DC employee rights attorney John Karl, and held that attorneys are free to make arguments based on inferences. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
We blogged about the problems with Guinan here.District of ColumbiaThe very first court to permit medical monitoring absent actual injury was a federal "prediction" of District of Columbia law. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 11:44 am
  And so he does again in his latest Sidebar Column on the most important case of the decade, District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IP Litigation Blog) New Jersey local patent rules (IP Frontline)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC applies KSR – finding combination claims obvious: Ball Aerosol v Limited Brands, Bath & Body Works etc (Patently-O) (IP Law Observer) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (Law360) CAFC rejects lower court’s ob [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 11:57 pm
More recent decisions (District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:11 am
BEHDAD, INC. et al District of Columbia District Court Filed: March 4, 2008 Plaintiff: LIFTED RESEARCH GROUP, INC. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Below you will find the UCP affiliates for Tennessee: UCP of Middle Tennessee 1200 9th Avenue North, Suite 110 Nashville, TN 37208 Phone: (615) 242-4091 Fax: (615) 242-3582 E-mail: info@ucpnashville.org Web: http://www.ucpnashville.org UCP of the Mid-South 4189 Leroy Memphis, TN 38108 Phone: (901) 761-4277 Fax: (901) 761-7876 E-mail: ucp@ucpmemphis.org Web: http://www.ucpmemphis.org TENNESSEE STATE RESOURCES AGING Tennessee Association of Homes and Services for the Aging 500 Interstate… [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:23 pm
District of Columbia decision was ably reported by "S. [read post]