Search for: "Barrett v. Hand"
Results 81 - 100
of 505
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
In Rucho v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
If it gets out of hand, should Swift be criminally charged. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:56 pm
EPA, and—most recently—Biden v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
In any event, Barrett made a policy decision to employ a heavy-handed interpretive tool that history simply does not supportIn the 2021-22 term, in Bruen and Dobbs, the conservative justices fell all over themselves to stress the importance of original public meaning to constitutional interpretation. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:28 pm
In Biden v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 8:56 am
” That’s why it was so significant that Justice Barrett authored a concurrence in Biden v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Moreover, when Judge Barrett was nominated to the Supreme Court, she had only a handful of high-profile cases. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Court then invoked its increasingly familiar “major questions doctrine” which, as the Court explained in West Virginia v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
In Yegiazaryan v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
By contrast, Justices Barrett and Kavanaugh likely joined the Court's progressives in Lombardo v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:28 am
Barrett, 427 S.C. 74 (Ct. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In Groff v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
Biden v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:38 am
In Biden v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
Brady also has a favorite writer: Justice Kagan, with Justice Barrett in second place, even though he might not agree with Barrett as often as he agrees with Kagan. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 5:09 am
Think, perhaps, of the case of Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
And the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm
On the other hand, in In re JR38 [2016] AC 1131, [2015] UKSC 42 (1 July 2015), the Supreme Court held that the publication by the police of CCTV footage of rioting, to identify those involved and to deter similar activity in the future, was justified. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:12 am
I when Congress hands off important policy questions to the executive branch. [read post]
