Search for: "Board of Review v. Second Judicial District Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 863
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
However, given the Fifth Circuit’s broad reading of the Supreme Court’s decision in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court’s June ruling in Moore v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 10:00 pm
However, many would agree that the proposed change would prevent one to use AIA trials before PTAB as a second chance to invalidate a claim, rather than as an alternative proceedings to civil trials in U.S. district courts. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 1:58 am
For purposes of judicial review, § 315(b)’s work as a statutory limit means that the en banc Federal Circuit correctly decided Wi-Fi One v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:33 pm
He then sued the PTO in district court for de novo review of the Board’s decision. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:00 am
The issues before the Court are: (1) Whether a district court’s determination of habitual residence under the Hague Convention should be reviewed de novo, as seven circuits have held, under a deferential version of de novo review, as the U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
Late last week, the Second Circuit issued a long-awaited opinion in Doe v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 4:39 pm
The Appellate Division, Second Department, upheld the lower court’s ruling, explaining that judicial review of a zoning board of appeals pursuant to Art. 78 is limited to “ascertaining whether the action was illegal, arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 4:00 am
For example, Renée-Claude Drouin writes that the court in Parry Sound (District) Welfare Administration Board v Ontario Public Service Employees Union Local 324 (SCC, 2003) “implicitly incorporated human rights and statutory labour rights into the content of collective agreements” (p 259). [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
However, said the Appellate Division, “because the full record is now before this Court, this Court will retain jurisdiction to decide the proceeding on the merits in the interest of judicial economy. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 1:36 pm
In a published opinion filed December 15, 2021, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 5) affirmed a trial court’s judgment entered after sustaining a demurrer to a writ petition in a CEQA action without leave to amend. [read post]
20 May 2017, 5:38 pm
Lastly, the court declined to take judicial notice of the City of Peoria’s City Council District Map, the City of Peoria Zoning Map, the City of Peoria Neighborhood Map, and the City of Peoria Historic Districts Map and Landmarks, as there was a reasonable dispute existing as to the accuracy of these documents. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:41 pm
Supreme Court handed down its long-awaited decision in McLane Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
See A Judicial Throwdown on CEQA's Baseline Requirements. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 4:53 pm
As we previously discussed earlier this month, District Court Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson issued an Order in American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:51 am
” On June 19, 2014, the Supreme Court decided Alice Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 4:30 am
” Finally, the court addressed the proper standard for judicial review in these cases, concluding that the standard is whether the Board's determination was arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:48 pm
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (“PTAB”) institution rate for inter partes reviews (“IPRs”) has fallen virtually every year. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 4:15 am
Yet, as made clear last week, the heightened standard necessary to institute an Inter Partes Review at the USPTO’s Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB), coupled with the recent outcome in Fresenius USA v. [read post]
