Search for: "Branch v. Smith" Results 81 - 100 of 572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2020, 8:25 am by Gabriel Chin
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard argument in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 2:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, reconsideration of those grounds is barred by the doctrine of law of the case (see Matter of Ise-Smith v Orok-Edem, 55 AD3d 610; Gropper v St. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am by John Elwood
Congress is fighting with the executive branch to try to obtain information this week. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 3:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In Armatas v Kestenbaum 2020 NY Slip Op 07846 [189 AD3d 1319] December 23, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department a city attorney-defendant kept at it until the case was dismissed on all grounds, actual or academic. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 3:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint, finding that these allegations, even if proven, would not entitle the plaintiff to relief pursuant to Judiciary Law § 487 (see Sammy v Haupel, 170 AD3d at 1225-1226; Seldon v Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, 116 AD3d 490, 491 [2014]; Schiller v Bender,… [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:16 pm
Lenard cashed the $8,000 within two days.Three weeks later, Mladenovic appeared at a Fifth Third branch in Westlake, Ohio, with a check for $70,000 to complete the purchase of his new home. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 7:01 am by Amanda Frost
One illuminating example of this behavior came last year in the oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
The second period represents a time of flux for privilege as the executive branch wrestles with the fallout from Watergate and attempts to interpret and apply United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:43 am by Marissa Miller
This blog’s Lyle Denniston and the New Orleans Times-Picayune preview tomorrow’s oral argument in Smith v. [read post]