Search for: "Burden v. Thomas"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2023, 9:00 pm
In Price v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:12 am
(Justice Thomas, as is his practice, said nothing, which probably was wise. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Thomas elected to submit the matter to a hearing whereby hearing officer would determine whether Thomas was capable of returning to work on restricted/light-duty assignment as of February 2010.** Although Thomas contended that the burden of proof was on the County to show that he was capable of returning to work in a restricted/light-duty capacity, the hearing officer disagreed, ruling that Thomas had the burden of proof to show that he was not… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:25 pm
Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:22 pm
[The Court doesn't decide whether that means they are subject to an "undue burden" test (as under Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 7:26 am
The Supreme Court's opinions in Citizens United v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:54 pm
Co. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:00 pm
In Vieth v Jubelirer, 541 U.S. 267 (2004), a plurality of the U.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 9:01 am
" Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito joined the opinion of Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 8:19 pm
The burden might be placed on the government to come forth [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 5:58 pm
Davis won in State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 1:46 pm
Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 6:35 am
Thomas W. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 6:35 am
Thomas W. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:06 pm
Casey [, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)] and Roe v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division disagreed, holding that under FOIL government records are presumptively available to the public unless they are statutorily exempted by Public Officers Law §87(2) and "Those exemptions are to be narrowly construed, with the burden resting on the agency to demonstrate that the requested material indeed qualifies for exemption" citing Hanig v State of N.Y. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 2:15 pm
THOMAS K. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:01 am
Thomas, No. 12-Civil-1464 (C.P. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 3:02 pm
Justices Scalia and Thomas dissented. [read post]
11 May 2018, 7:46 pm
The Court found the combination of the confidential relationship and the suspicious circumstances was more than sufficient to shift the burden to Thomas. [read post]
