Search for: "Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway" Results 81 - 100 of 129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2023, 4:45 am by Eric B. Meyer
In 2006, the Supreme Court set the bar for retaliation in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 12:02 pm by Dorsey
Eric Feit applied for a conductor position with the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway company. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by David Wagner
The 10 issues to watch are: Offshore wind power generation Renewable energy incentive programs Hydraulic fracturing regulation Aggregation Greenhouse gas litigation California's cap-and-trade program California's Green Chemistry program New mercury standards for coal and oil-burning power plants Fallout from CERCLA decision in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 7:02 am by Daniel Hemel
Yes, you are reading that right: BNSF — the company formerly known as Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway — is arguing for a higher tax bill. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 4:01 am by Sean Wajert
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co., 535 F.3d 759 (7th Cir. 2008). [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 11:52 am
Supreme Court decision in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:31 am by railroadaccidentfelalawyer
In Missouri (MO), a switchman who had worked with Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway suffered an irreparable tear to the disc between two of the vertebrae in his lower back when the switch he was working first jammed, then snapped back into him. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm by admin
 The ARB formally adopted the Williams standard, which states that any nontrivial unfavorable employment action is an adverse action, but curiously the ARB also retained the Title VII Burlington Northern standard as a persuasive interpretive tool. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 3:11 pm by admin
 The ARB formally adopted the Williams standard, which states that any nontrivial unfavorable employment action is an adverse action, but curiously the ARB also retained the Title VII Burlington Northern standard as a persuasive interpretive tool. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 5:00 am by Shannon Moran
Rose serves as a member of BNSF Railway Company and Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:34 pm
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co., 535 F.3d 759 (7th Cir. 2008)(Bullard plaintiffs request to a stipulation to a trial covering fewer than 100 plaintiffs required under CAFA for an action to be deemed a “mass action” did not impact CAFA jurisdiction.). [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 9:56 pm
Supreme Court's decision in Burlington Northern& Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 8:20 am
 And, the Roberts Court also decided Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 2:57 pm by railroadaccidentfelalawyer
In March 2011, A crash involving a van containing Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad workers and a BNSF freight train occurred at a crossing in a rail yard in Kelso, Washington (WA), That crash killed three of the rail employees and left a fourth man in the vehicle with severe injuries. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:28 am by Nathaniel M. Glasser
  The court refused to decide whether that element requires a showing of “material adversity” – as articulated for Title VII claims in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 7:47 am
The Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California secretly tested workers for sickle cell trait and other genetic disorders from the 1960s through 1993; workers were told it was routine cholesterol screening.In another incident, Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. paid 36 employees $2.2 million in 2002 to settle a lawsuit in which the workers claimed the company sought to genetically test them without their knowledge after they had… [read post]