Search for: "C H v. State of Indiana" Results 81 - 100 of 169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Michelle Meyer, Geisinger Health System, (Still) Waiting to Exhale: Why the Future of Biospecimens Research Remains Unclear after the Final RuleMark Rothstein, University of Louisville School of Medicine, International Health ResearchNicolas Terry, Indiana University Robert H. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 3:58 pm
Strom Thurmond's Brown v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:55 pm by Sarah Grant
On Friday, the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR) reversed the abatement in United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(Johns Hopkins University)Siegel Ron (Northwestern University)Smith David C. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Beck, No. 5:06-CT-3018-H, 2006 WL3914717 (E.D.N.C. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Sherwood Medical Industries, 836 F.2d 296, 298-99 (7th Cir. 1987) (applying Indiana law). [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Most Cited CasesA general demurrer in an answer is sufficient to preserve a statute of frauds objection.[5] KeyCite Citing References for this Headnote 118A Declaratory Judgment 118AIII Proceedings 118AIII(H) Appeal and Error 118Ak392 Appeal and Error 118Ak393 k. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]