Search for: "CAMPAIGN/RESPONSIBLE v. FDA"
Results 81 - 100
of 150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s 1977 Abood v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 9:11 pm
April 21, 2021 | Accessibility Is Not Optional | COVID-19 vaccine distribution campaigns must prioritize compliance with disability laws. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 10:59 am
Stanway v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 12:58 pm
American Beverage Ass’ v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
No promotional campaign (off- or on-label) can work for that long if the drug in question doesn’t work. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
” Clearly, the target audience for education (pros and cons) about food irradiation and FDA’s new rule concerning fresh iceberg lettuce and spinach, should be the 80 percent “in the middle. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:02 pm
It is your responsibility to understand when you brake[sic] the law. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 9:23 am
FDA will be working on social media through 2010. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 6:12 am
“We don’t believe that the dissemination of an FDA- approved package insert constitutes a violation of the South Carolina Trade Practices Act,” Kara Russell, a spokeswoman for Janssen said in an e-mailed statement. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:43 am
FEDERAL JUDGE EXPANDS COVERAGE FOR PLAN B, Tummino v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 11:48 am
The association’s political arm ranked 14th in giving to 2008 political campaigns with $3.5 million, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 2:30 pm
The association’s political arm ranked 14th in giving to 2008 political campaigns with $3.5 million, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:50 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:22 am
Attorneys eligible are not limited to Plaintiffs’ National Liaison Counsel and members of Plaintiffs’ National Steering Committee, but include, for example, other attorneys called upon by them to assist in performing their responsibilities, State Liaison Counsel, and other attorneys performing similar responsibilities in state court actions in which the presiding state-court judge has imposed similar obligations upon plaintiffs to contribute to the fund. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:47 pm
Ciccio v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:30 am
In Teamsters Local 237 Welfare Fund v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:02 am
The court then gave special attention to plaintiffs’ argument for strict scrutiny, which was that the government was attempting to make commercial speakers into its “mouthpiece” for a “subjective and highly controversial marketing campaign expressing its disapproval of their lawful products. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. [read post]
