Search for: "CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT v. US " Results 81 - 100 of 7,757
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2018, 2:00 am by Adrian Miedema
The OLRB decided that, in this case, the starting of the confidential-information lawsuit against the employee was protected by absolute privilege, and therefore could not be used as the basis of a safety-retaliation complaint against the employer at the OLRB. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:45 am by Neil Wilkof
Kat friend Paul McClelland reports on a judgment in Singapore concerning the use of confidential information gained from settlement negotiations. [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:33 am
This court declines to adopt defendant's characterization of Google as a confidential informant.Although defendant and the People accurately summarize the current state of New York law regarding the use of confidential informants in applications for search warrants, neither provides New York or federal precedent that addresses whether an internet search engine, such as Google, can be considered a confidential informant under these… [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 7:00 pm by Hannah Roskey
All employees on Coast’s internal computer system were assigned a “personal folder,” intended to be used for confidential information pertaining to the company for the sole use of that employee. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 12:05 pm by Dan Frith
We constantly hear from the employers, and their attorneys, that the departing employees have "stolen" confidential pricing information and are using the information to the disadvantage of the employer. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 6:23 am
On the other hand, expiration of a restrictive covenant does not permit a former employee or business owner to use proprietary and confidential information or trade secrets of a business that are otherwise protectible. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 6:55 pm
The Commonwealth produced no evidence to show that the confidential informant used in this case had been reliable in the past; rather that the CI had merely been "used" in the past. [read post]