Search for: "Campbell v. May et al"
Results 81 - 100
of 147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2014, 12:51 am
Does this mean that satire is also permitted, because the term “parody” encompasses what Posner et al. would call “weapon parody” (i.e satire)? [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:54 am
Google is also very high-profile, the make-it-or-break-it question of the appeal was copyrightability) is the "Google Books" case, The Authors Guild, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am
WRIGHT ET AL., FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE § 2757 (3d ed. 2013). [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
Examples are US v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
” (R. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:24 am
In Henderson, et al. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
See, e.g., Campbel, aka Skywalker, et al. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 11:50 pm
The judge rightly refers to the major Supreme Court case on fair use, the Campbell v. [read post]
12 May 2012, 10:57 am
The long awaited trial judgment in the Cambridge et al v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:27 am
Campbell; Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:27 am
Campbell; Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 1:59 pm
The court ruling was based on the condemnor’s failure to engage in bona fide negotiations as required by N.J.S.A. 20:3-6, et al., of the Eminent Domain Act. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
They may enable us to get a keener insight into our society and its problems. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 2:41 pm
Guergis v Novak et al Statement of Claim [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:32 pm
OBG Ltd et al v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:32 am
Yellowley et. al. , 272 U.S. 581 (1926), the U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:13 am
MMI Products, Inc., et al. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:32 pm
Precision Lift, Inc., et al., Ninth Circuit Case No. 6:10-CV-00044, filed August 22, 2011, 2011 U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
Tucker et al. [read post]
19 May 2011, 4:33 am
PNAS 2007 May 22;104(21):8897-8901 [3] Lajeunesse A et al. [read post]
