Search for: "Chevron U.S.A. Holdings Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 177
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
As I shall explain, Scalia was right and Gorsuch is wrong.The Chevron Doctrine and Justice ScaliaThe Chevron doctrine gets its name from a 1984 case, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 8:02 am
Applying the principles of agency deference described in Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 7:35 am
” Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 9:45 am
Under Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 11:35 am
Specifically, the court held that the DOL’s interpretation of “salesman” was not to be given deference under Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
[Sasha Volokh] Can a state immunize its agencies from federal antitrust law through judicial review?
13 Sep 2016, 7:16 am
., Inc., 971 S.W.2d 439, 442 (Tex. 1998). [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 1:41 pm
Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 5:57 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (1984).Chevron step one. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm
" Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:42 pm
[Blogger’s Note: This post is submitted as a necessarily-lengthy formal comment to the November 20, 2015 draft guidance of U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 6:37 am
” At the very least, the court concluded, the BIA’s interpretation to that effect was “reasonable,” and therefore entitled to deference under the Court’s 1984 decision in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
" Second, because the regulation was duly promulgated after a notice-and-comment period and has not changed since its promulgation in 1970, the Court reviewed the regulation under the "reasonableness" standard set forth in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:30 am
Certain district courts have concluded that the statute contains an ambiguity that warrants deference to the SEC rule under Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
The dust-up in Delaware over fee-shifting bylaws got started in May 2014, when the Delaware Supreme Court in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Importantly, Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 3:25 pm
(Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 2:39 pm
§ 1.78) are applied (...)Yes, the Supreme Court Chevron case comes up:Judge Andrews' decision that HTC was correct in challenging the priority of the '105, '181, and '720 patents was based in his determination that the PTO was not entitled to deference under Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
Finding that the statutory language was “subject to at least two different interpretations,” that court went on to apply the familiar rule of administrative law from the case of Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 8:20 am
Under Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 7:52 pm
Any gloss put on the regulation in that notice binds the public under Chevron[3] deference (though the many exceptions to Chevron are far less known). [read post]
