Search for: "City and County of San Francisco v. Superior Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 207
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco, he notes that the court has recognized that the amendment’s purpose “is to safeguard the privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by governmental officials. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:32 am
Other cities and counties joined the litigation, including the City and County of San Francisco; the Cities of Oakland and San Diego; and the Counties of Alameda, Los Angeles, Monterey, San Mateo, Solano, and Ventura.In 2014, the Santa Clara County Superior Court ruled that three former lead paint manufacturers — The Sherwin-Williams Company, ConAgra Grocery Products, and… [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:03 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2002) 27 Cal.4th 643, 663-671; Santa Monica Beach, Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:20 pm
” The Court opined that the statutory exemption “endorsed the approach of the First District” in another CEQA “parking impacts” case, San Francisco Upholding the Downtown Plan v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 1:42 pm
Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:06 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 950, 956, emph. added by Court, internal quotes omitted.) [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2017) 16 Cal.App.5th 261. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:12 am
After hearing post-trial motions, Judge Kleinberg in January 2014 ordered three defendant companies to pay $1.15 billion, to be shared among Alameda, Los Angeles, Monterey, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano and Ventura counties, and the cities of Oakland, San Diego and San Francisco. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:39 am
In a published opinion filed September 28, 2017, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Alameda County Superior Court’s judgment denying appellant Living Rivers Council’s (LRC) writ petition challenging the State Water Resources Control Board’s (the “SWRCB” or “Board”) approval of a policy designed to maintain instream flows in coastal streams north of San Francisco. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:39 am
In a published opinion filed September 28, 2017, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Alameda County Superior Court’s judgment denying appellant Living Rivers Council’s (LRC) writ petition challenging the State Water Resources Control Board’s (the “SWRCB” or “Board”) approval of a policy designed to maintain instream flows in coastal streams north of San Francisco. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of South San Francisco (September 18, 2017) 2017 Cal. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of South San Francisco (September 18, 2017) 2017 Cal. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 498, 515), it is well established that courts in such actions have inherent power in appropriate circumstances to remand to the agency for further proceedings prior to entering a final judgment. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2014) 229 Cal.App.4th 498, 515), it is well established that courts in such actions have inherent power in appropriate circumstances to remand to the agency for further proceedings prior to entering a final judgment. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:36 am
City and County of San Francisco (13 Cal.App.5th 1), which was published on June 27, 2017, the Court of Appeal reiterated that officers are entitled to an administrative appeal of punitive action and determined that the City had not provided such an appeal. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:00 am
Superior Court (1961) 189 CA2d 6, 12; City & County of San Francisco v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:00 am
Superior Court (1961) 189 CA2d 6, 12; City & County of San Francisco v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 9:33 am
Given that the California Supreme Court, in City of San Jose v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:11 pm
(See, e.g., Board of Pilot Comrs. for the Bays of San Francisco, San Pablo and Suisun v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
(G049691; 236 Cal.App.4th 1341; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2012-00593557.) [read post]
