Search for: "City of Los Angeles v. Department of Health"
Results 81 - 100
of 226
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm
City of Los Angeles, 2019 WL 3213581 (C.D. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:00 am
Subsequent to the FDA approval of Epidiolox, The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) issued a Final Order placing “FDA-approved drugs that contain CBD derived from cannabis and no more than 0.1 percent tetrahydrocannabinols” [such as Epidiolox] in Schedule V of the Controlled Substances Act,” “Schedule V drugs are considered to have the lowest potential for abuse compared to other scheduled drugs and a low potential for psychological or physical… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
See also Comm’rs of Parks & Boulevards of City of Detroit v Moesta, 91 Mich 149, 152-53; 51 NW 903 (1892); In re Edward J. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
At the time of the crash, she was returning home from a Los Angeles Dodgers baseball game she attended with her family and friends. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 1:05 pm
Allegation: Pretrial detainee was denied bed, slept on floor for his three-and-a-half-day stay at Los Angeles County jail facility. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
Bottini v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
Selikoff arrived in Los Angeles, California, from Sydney, Australia, on the S.S. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 9:00 am
City of Los Angeles, Case No. 15-56990 (9th Cir. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
The Los Angeles City Council voted to increase efforts to ease the health impacts of air pollution for schools, day cares, and senior care centers located within 1,000 feet of a freeway. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
Hughes and County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 10:45 am
In Dahlia v. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am
In addition, 15 localities—Austin, Baltimore, Buffalo, Chicago, Columbia (MO), the District of Columbia, Los Angeles, Montgomery County (MD), New York City, Philadelphia, Portland (OR), Prince George’s County (MD), Rochester, San Francisco, and Seattle—have also extended their state’s “Ban the Box” laws to private employers. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:07 am
In addition, 15 localities—Austin, Baltimore, Buffalo, Chicago, Columbia (MO), the District of Columbia, Los Angeles, Montgomery County (MD), New York City, Philadelphia, Portland (OR), Prince George’s County (MD), Rochester, San Francisco, and Seattle—have also extended their state’s “Ban the Box” laws to private employers. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:27 am
In addition, 15 localities—Austin, Baltimore, Buffalo, Chicago, Columbia (MO), the District of Columbia, Los Angeles, Montgomery County (MD), New York City, Philadelphia, Portland (OR), Prince George’s County (MD), Rochester, San Francisco, and Seattle—have also extended their state’s “Ban the Box” laws to private employers. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
