Search for: "Code of Judicial Conduct"
Results 81 - 100
of 4,869
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 10:14 am
Code Reg. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
Code that deals with the National Guard) permits the state National Guard troops to remain subject to state command and control but are used for federal missions authorized by Congress. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 8:55 am
The new code of conduct, however, was immediately critiqued as being inadequate, insufficient, and imprecise. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
The Court has faced criticism, not only from those who disagree with its decisions, but also from those who believe it has not properly used its emergency docket, or that it ought to have a written, enforceable code of ethics. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
It also found Shipley inapplicable and opined that any Shipley exception is limited to those situations in which a petitioner has acted diligently, and the Appeals Board’s misleading conduct deprives the petitioner of administrative or judicial review. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
Known as Texas Senate Bill 4, it adds a new chapter to Title 1 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 10:41 am
Part V covers “Sexual Offences, Public Morals and Disorderly Conduct”. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:20 am
Supporting her claim, the plaintiff cited Maryland Code § 19-504.1 of the Insurance Article. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Instead, he argues that the Colorado case is distinguishable from them, even if Donald Trump’s conduct on January 6, 2021 is covered by Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, because there’s a theoretical possibility that two-thirds of both houses of Congress might (in the words of Section 3) “remove” his Section 3 “disability” to serve in the office of the presidency if he is elected to it. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Instead, he argues that the Colorado case is distinguishable from them, even if Donald Trump’s conduct on January 6, 2021 is covered by Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, because there’s a theoretical possibility that two-thirds of both houses of Congress might (in the words of Section 3) “remove” his Section 3 “disability” to serve in the office of the presidency if he is elected to it. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
In this post I’ll simply flag a couple of points that haven’t been sufficiently emphasized yet, or that warrant particular additional attention in light of the CRSCC’s arguments: Chase’s Argument was Focused on Judicial Removal of Officials Already in Office. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am
That court, he contends, imputed the conduct of others to Trump. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 1:54 am
In December 2015, a new Article 168-1 was added to the Criminal Code which criminalised the conduct of Islamic religious rites and rituals by citizens of the Republic of Azerbaijan who had obtained their religious education abroad [6], but he continued to preach and conduct Friday prayers at the mosque despite official warnings. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:44 am
’ She suggested he had violated the judicial code of conduct and that she might use the allegation as ammunition in a request for a new trial. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
The Code on Civil Procedure generally requires civil law court proceedings and the delivery of judgments to be public. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The middle clause [2], by contrast—the “Officials Clause”—describes the precondition for someone being potentially subject to Section 3 in the first instance, namely, that the person has at some earlier point “taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 3:38 pm
” Additionally, Habba cites Canon 3(C) of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, which states that judges should disqualify themselves if one of the counsels is a previous colleague. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 11:07 am
” This only requires the IRS to show (generally through an affidavit) that: (1) the investigation is conducted pursuant to a legitimate purpose; (2) the inquiry may be relevant to that purpose; (3) the information sought is not already within the IRS’s possession; and (4) the IRS has followed all administrative steps required by the Code prior to seeking enforcement. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
The motion was filed by counsel for Michael Roman in the Fulton County, Georgia, election interference case arising from Donald Trump’s demand to “find 11,780 votes” and associated conduct by him and his co-conspirators. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:41 am
Resources Code, § 21080(a).) [read post]
