Search for: "Commonwealth v. Auguste" Results 81 - 100 of 464
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am by Michael Douglas
  Following an unsuccessful mediation in August 2019, Hannigan considered that clause 23.6 of the contract—extracted below—entitled him to refer the dispute to arbitration. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
Expert witness opinions about the nature and cause of plaintiffs’ medical conditions, are the linchpin of mass tort cases involving claims of bodily injury from allegedly harmful products. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:43 pm by Shannon O'Hare
Length of Moratorium The moratorium remains in effect until the earlier to occur of (i) August 18, 2020 (which date is extendable by the Governor in 90-day increments) or (ii) 45 days after the COVID-19 state of emergency in the Commonwealth is lifted. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:31 am by Shannon O'Hare
The country’s exports are down from 1.046m barrels per day (bpd) in February to approximately 795,000 bpd in March, the lowest since August 2019, marking a further threat to PDVSA. [read post]
There are certainly some judges in the Commonwealth who are hostile to non-compete agreements and would take the latter approach, so careful drafting will be necessary if S.1117 becomes law. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
This Client Advisory, originally distributed in December 2019, highlights important developments in the law governing employee benefit plans and executive compensation over the past year. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
Analogies can be drawn with the Court’s concerns in this jurisdiction in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2016] 1 AC 108), albeit that was a civil privacy case and not a criminal one. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Alex Green is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Law at the University of Hng Kong, having joined in August 2017. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am by UKSC Live Blogging
  Mr O’Neill QC clarifies, that is reduction of the Order of Counsel dated 28 August 2019. 1550: Mr O’Neill QC states  that Article 9 of the Bill of Rights 1689 is not to be used in a manner to ‘coax executive action’. 1548: Aidan O’Neill QC states that there is suggestion of a remedy being a matter for the discretion of the court by using ‘equitable judgment’. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 5:30 am by Kevin
The facts seem to have been a little more complicated in Commonwealth v. [read post]