Search for: "Commonwealth v. Cross" Results 81 - 100 of 544
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2020, 7:06 am
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (SCOPA), recently issued its opinion in Carr v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
Expert witness opinions about the nature and cause of plaintiffs’ medical conditions, are the linchpin of mass tort cases involving claims of bodily injury from allegedly harmful products. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Commonwealth, the Ohio Supreme Court’s ruling in Rutherford, and the New York Constitutional Convention of 1821. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 2:46 am by Orin S. Kerr
  Last week, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court handed down what I believe is the first appellate decision on the question, Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 11:31 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Cal. 2017) (arrest by state officer "needed to be supported by probable cause based on the elements of those state laws"); Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm by Elliot Setzer, William Ford
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Tuesday, February 4, 2020, at 10:00 a.m.: Governance Studies at The Brookings Institution will convene a panel of policy experts to discuss President Trump’s 2020 State of the Union address to Congress and the nation. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
DOL Proposes New Electronic Distribution Rule Errors in ACA Penalty Assessments Require Prompt Employer Action New Health Care Design Opportunity for Large Employers: Individual HRAs Newly Proposed Health Insurance Cost and Coverage Transparency Requirements Remedial Amendment Period Closing Soon for Self-Correcting 403(b) Plans IRS Opens Determination Letter Window to Cash Balance and Other Hybrid Plans Final Regulations on 401(k) Hardship Withdrawals Massachusetts Among Several States Implementing… [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 11:21 pm by Maria Hook
Written by Jack Wass, Stout Street Chambers, New Zealand On 5 December 2019, the New Zealand Court of Appeal released a significant decision on jurisdiction over land in cross-border cases. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Although marriage is a fundamental right, this is not a case—like Loving or, more recently, Obergefell v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am by UKSC Live Blogging
  1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]